FOCUS Home

        
        

german

Background: Industrial cities and regions under pressure to adapt

The regions of Central and Eastern Europe have been under particular pressure to adapt since the fundamental political, social and, above all, economic changes in the early 1990s. Numerous cities and regions that for decades had been the motors of economic development on account of their industrial base are now confronted by socio-economic and ecological structural problems of a far-reaching nature. The European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) and the European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT) view the necessary process of revitalising industrialized cities and regions as a problem with pan-European implications. The question of how structural change in these problem areas is to be tackled is especially topical in the context of EU Eastern Enlargement.

Reflecting historical developments, research has been carried out on industrialized cities and regions in the western European, market-economy-type States since the late 1970s. By contrast, it is only in the last ten years that there have been significant numbers of studies addressing transformation-related structural problems in industrialized cities and regions in the States of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Research on transformation processes has focused both on general problems and on specific problems of transition in individual countries and groups thereof. There are also now a plethora of publications relating to the spatial impact of transformation.

As regards effects on the spatial categorisation of industrialized cities and regions, however, research to date is still scant. There is a notable dearth of studies offering synoptical analysis of industrialized cities and regions in greater numbers of transformation States.

Common Research - Practice oriented Exchange of Experience

Currently rectifying this is a project entitled "The Future of Industrialized Cities and Regions - Central and Eastern European Experiences in Comparison (FOCUS)", which is being funded within the scope of the EU Interreg IIC programme as well as by the German Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing (BMVBW) and the Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Under the stewardship of the Institute of Ecological and Regional Development (IÖR), a consortium of members of the CEE Network from 11 countries is examining the problems occurring in industrialized areas of central and eastern Europe and the strategies being adopted there.

The project's aims are twofold, in line with the Interreg funding it enjoys: it is seeking to jointly arrive at scientific findings whilst also serving as a forum for the direct, practically oriented exchange of know-how between the participating parties. Taking part besides the EU countries Austria and Germany are CEE States Bulgaria, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Ukraine and Hungary.

The project aims to gain solutions to cope with structural weaknesses of traditional industrial regions of the central and eastern European countries by means of a transnational research design. Furthermore a common exchange of experiences between communities (especially small and medium sized towns) in regions undergoing structural changes and the regional actors will be established. By this means a transnational solution of problems concerning structural changes in problem regions with their economic, social and ecological consequences will be initiated.

Core questions

The following aspects are main areas of discussion in the project:
  1. Identification of common features of traditional industrial regions with structural weaknesses in the Central and Eastern European countries:
    • Can certain types of regions be identified facing similar problems of structural change? Can specific types of problems be detected for these regions?
    • Which indicators - based on the types of problems - characterise these regions?
    • Is the database to investigate the necessary indicators practicable and comparable?
    • Can these indicators be used in different countries?
  2. Strategies to develop traditional industrial regions with structural weaknesses:
    • Which strategies are used in Central and Eastern European regions identified in step 1?
    • What are their strengths and weaknesses in facing structural changes and the linked challenges (conversion of industrial sites, migration, unemployment, ecological damages)?
    • Are the gained (positive as well as negative) experiences with these strategies useful and practicable for other countries?
The project can furthermore contribute to promote the pre-accession strategy for the Central and Eastern European countries that is supported by instruments such as ISPA and PHARE.

Sources:

  • Office for publications of the European Communities (1999) (Ed.): European Spatial Development Perspective (E.S.D.P.). Luxemburg

Download at

  • European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT) (2000): Guiding principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent. Hannover 7th-8th September 2000

Download at

objectives Country Reports Case Studies Results Links Partners Contact